President Bush

Ciphus

Member!
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Clinton kept Osama off our backs for a couple years? That must have been because the numerous Embassy Bombings and the USS Cole bombing didn't happen during Clintons term. Wait, yeah they did.

The US Media is, on the most part, liberally biased. Fox News is known to be conservative, even though their motto is Fair and Balanced. To add to the list Lights had, add the New York Times newspaper. They have a lot of influece and are incredibly liberal.

Our economy didn't bounce back as fast as it should have after 9/11? It was increasing at the fastest rate in a number of years...20 I believe. It was definately more than 10. I'd say that's a pretty good bounceback.
 

Lights

Member!
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
898
Reaction score
1
Location
Beyond Religion and Science
Website
Visit site
Originally posted by Forged
Actually Bush lost in the total vote count by over 600,000 votes. He won the electorial vote because of alot of questinable things going on. Now it is true that Al Gore demanded a recount and got one sort of, but when it looked like Gore was going to win the Supreme court froze the recount and declared Bush the winner.
I wasnt talking about the overall vote across the US, I was speaking specifically about Florida. The Supreme Court abolished the 2nd, or perhaps
even 3rd, recount (which was going on weeks after the voting was done) because it was unconstitutional...

"In most cases, comity and respect for federalism compel us to defer to the decisions of state courts on issues of state law. That practice reflects our understanding that the decisions of state courts are definitive pronouncements of the will of the States as sovereigns ... Of course, in ordinary cases, the distribution of powers among the branches of a State's government raises no questions of federal constitutional law, subject to the requirement that the government be republican in character.... But there are a few exceptional cases in which the Constitution imposes a duty or confers a power on a particular branch of a State s government. This is one of them."


Originally posted by ORC-r0x0r-ROC
I think thats fake, he would've of gotten about 50%
At least you are thinking, but...source?

Ah, lights, I didn't know you had a sense of humour.
My sense of humour is quite fine, but why are you talking about it? Seems odd you would bring it up in the middle of a debate.

They don't show a lot of things that incriminate Bush, sigh.
Eh? If there is a negative story about Bush or any Republican person or idea, they papers and stations are all over it. Its on everyone front page and everyones top story. BUt when something good happens they either try to point out/make up problems in it or completely ignore it all together.

Why doesn't jr.Bush follow his father completely like he has been doing, only last one term. The bad thing is that his fathers ways got him elected. The good thing is his dads ways didn't get him relected. We don't penalize him because he is rich, we penalize him because he's a daddys boy that has had everything done for him. [
Is that everyones now thing now, to talk about his dad? I think you just need to move on. Look past that and into the stuff that matters.


He kept the Al-queda off your back for a couple of years...
He could have gotten them off permanently, but refused. He was too busy fusking with Monica. :rolleyes

You were like a kid with some toys butting in while a teacher was telling a bully off.
No, not at all. We did exactly like I said, exactly how we should have done. Saddam was a bully picking on and beating up the weakers "kids" around hom. America is the big older brother coming to help them out.

He is the only president since hoover to lose jobs. I will edit this later.
He is also the only president who had to go through 9/11 and a changing market, with businesses wanting to shift jobs overseas.


Bush's pants are on fire. You know, from all the lieing he does
Sure thing, if you wish to believe that, go ahead.

Yea, that website is no different than all the others. They use the same lame arguements that do not even make sense.

That quote you posted could so easily be picked apart. I could do it myself, but I dont really see the need, its been done time and time again.
 

ORC-r0x0r-ROC

Like my cute wabbit?
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
1,152
Reaction score
0
Location
Take a guess...
Website
Visit site
My sense of humour is quite fine, but why are you talking about it? Seems odd you would bring it up in the middle of a debate.
So what, you said a joke :)
Eh? If there is a negative story about Bush or any Republican person or idea, they papers and stations are all over it. Its on everyone front page and everyones top story. BUt when something good happens they either try to point out/make up problems in it or completely ignore it all together.
Half the stuff that is bad about him never gets on the news or anything, at least over here.
He could have gotten them off permanently, but refused. He was too busy fusking with Monica.
It really doesn't matter who he ****s, or if it did, I wonder who Bush is ****ing.
No, not at all. We did exactly like I said, exactly how we should have done. Saddam was a bully picking on and beating up the weakers "kids" around hom. America is the big older brother coming to help them out.
There are so many countries that you could've helped, why Iraq? Leave it to the U.N next time.
He is also the only president who had to go through 9/11 and a changing market, with businesses wanting to shift jobs overseas.
Many presidents have gone through a lot worse and did better than him.
Sure thing, if you wish to believe that, go ahead.
It's a fact. He lies, he's a liar, a very bad one too.
That quote you posted could so easily be picked apart. I could do it myself, but I dont really see the need, its been done time and time again.
Go ahead, it's right about Bush.
Clinton kept Osama off our backs for a couple years? That must have been because the numerous Embassy Bombings and the USS Cole bombing didn't happen during Clintons term. Wait, yeah they did.
Look at all the bombings in Bush's term, MUCH MORE.
Our economy didn't bounce back as fast as it should have after 9/11? It was increasing at the fastest rate in a number of years...20 I believe. It was definately more than 10. I'd say that's a pretty good bounceback
You spent so long mourning, then 1 day you fianally decide to go back to work.
lame arguements
There are pretty good arguments, most people should've find it easy to make sense of it.
Thats not a fair comparison. Hoover's job loss was do to a stockmarket depression caused by years of bad monitoring of the SM.
It's true though.
And anothering thing, the death toll is near 600 now I think, we are in a WAR. Look at any past US War and the death rates excede it many times (yes there was probaly a few that weren't as bad). Oh and onto my views of Bush, Bush is a great president whos had a bad term, Kerry is a man who'll do anything for a vote. I think Bush is going to win, a few months ago, Bush was leading the polls by around, 60% I think, the largest lead in US History that early in a race, usually its spread out when there are many canidates, oh well, just my view...
His approval rating was like 50%. He's a bad president, he lies to the people he is supposed to be serving.
 

Plumpamania

Member!
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
617
Reaction score
0
Location
The Shire
Website
Visit site
Here are a couple of questions about Dubbya.

If he can't control is partying, alcoholic daughters, how is he going to control a nation?

If Bush is such a great President why not focus on Osama Bin Laden, ya know the one who actually killed our men? Not Saddam?

If Clinton was so bad why didn't 9/11 happen on his term? (I'll tell you why, it's b/c he did look out againt Terrorism and he had even bombed Iraq. The reason it happened to Bush is b/c he let internal lookouts down and internal military down and concentrated on building up our military over seas. Clinton did cut it down, but concentrated on our home country, not embassys or other foreign land bases)

If Bush is so great why didn't our economy rebound better?

If Bush is so great, why is he concentrating on Steroids in baseball instead of Terrorism?

If Bush was so great, why don't we have Osama in custody?

If Bush was so great, why does he lie about weapons of mass destraction, I mean destruction?(I'll tell you why again, b/c he can't govern a country so by picking a war, the concentration goes to what Powell does and how the war goes and not internal affairs).

Bottom line, Kerry is a vote monger, Gore is a 2 faced bastard, and Bush is a lying, stupid, ignorant moron.

Me, I'll vote Al Sharpton.
 

New threads

Top