eventually you will learn my posting stylesWing Zero, there is a rubric on what deductions are worth. Say if someone falls, a judge can't deem what they think it is worth because the rubric says eight-tenth.
Jesus shut up, learn sarcasm or at the very least lurk at 4chan for awhile.Wing Zero, there is a rubric on what deductions are worth. Say if someone falls, a judge can't deem what they think it is worth because the rubric says eight-tenth.
?????The 'Tie-Breaker' was bull****. Seven of the countries on the judging board have never even produced medal winning olympic gymnasts. Jealousy/Ignorance? I think so.
That is only one view, because you are watching American television. I would think judges know more than the announcers.Yeah, except in this case Nastia's had a lot fewer noticeable errors. Like Bela, the announcers, etc. said the only reason the Chinese won was because of inadequacies and lack of experience on the judging panel.
On the contrary, I thought He had two big mistakes - one flat moment and her landing - but Liukin had quite a few more...*Yeah, except in this case Nastia's had a lot fewer noticeable errors. Like Bela, the announcers, etc. said the only reason the Chinese won was because of inadequacies and lack of experience on the judging panel.
You guys did your all. The world's all out to get you though, not allowing kangaroo pouch racing and wombat wrestling and some of your national sports.I think Australia has run out of medals to win. I think we did pretty well.
lol nope. gj on that dive. and a big LOL @ china for screwing that upI think Australia has run out of medals to win. I think we did pretty well.
/giantrolleyessmileyon the contrary, i thought he had two big mistakes - one flat moment and her landing - but liukin had quite a few more...*