anyone who denies that the GWT isn't a real threat has been living under a rock...in the last 5-10 years we've had some of the most extreme weather ever recorded ALL over the world, you wont have to look far for proof thereof...
However, the record highest temperature ever measured in the U.S (134 degrees F at Death Valley, CA in July of 1913), and the hottest temperature ever recorded anywhere on the globe (136 F at Al' Aziziyah, Libya in September of 1922) occurred well before global warming was a buzzword, and despite the recent series of warm years, globally, these records have not seriously threatened
Hot spots <> overall increase in temeprature.I suppose...
But i mean, we're saying the world is being the hottest it's been, but the hottest temperature recorded has was back in the 1930's IIRC...
I'll get the source when i find it...
eh, i was off 10 years, but still
yea i agree with that which is why little is being done about it. On a serious note, I dont believe enough research has been done on this whole global warming issue. If any money should be spent, it should be on research.Too bad the world is run by coins and bills.
if the governments tried to do something about, then the first thing they will estimate is how much money they will lose or gain from doing it. Basically, effect in their economy.
We suck =/
*What exactly is wrong with taking the effect on the economy as a major factor in determining what should be done? *And why is that a reason that nothing will be done? Alternative energy is sought after by many people because of high gas prices (economy) and dependence on foreign countries (strategic). In the economy, things that are energy efficient and emit less CO2 is becoming more competitive with things that do not. *And finally, why should the government be what fights Global Warming? It seems the free market is moving in that direction because using less energy is simply more efficient and pursuing technology in R&D is considered a good investment. Special interest groups are affecting businesses and NGO's. Explain your reasoning to the three questions in this post marked by a "*".Too bad the world is run by coins and bills.
Global warming will never cease to get worsened, if the governments tried to do something about, then the first thing they will estimate is how much money they will lose or gain from doing it. Basically, effect in their economy.
We suck =/
*Fact* we have have high gas prices because the united states has not built another refinery in years. I think the last one was built in 1976.Alternative energy is sought after by many people because of high gas prices (economy) and dependence on foreign countries (strategic).
Fact: 3 dollars and some crap per gallon is nothing.
Seriously, if you guys are complaining, come to Europe, or the rest of the entire planet, and see what a non-oil addicted policy does to your gas prices.
*Fact* We actually have roughly half the refinaries today than we did in 1976 (supply kept up by expansion of current refinaries) because of federal government regulation makes it so incredibly costly to even get approval to build a refinary.*Fact* we have have high gas prices because the united states has not built another refinery in years. I think the last one was built in 1976.
This isn't just about US this is about every nation on earth and Al Gore's movie has impacted people all over the globe. US however is the largest emitter of CO2 in the world.the popular idea is tat USA is polluting the earth and is knocking the balance of nature. The earth is getting warmer due to this and is going to be uninhabitable by te year 2100 or 2050 or something like that.
Firstly, the global warming theory was around long before Al Gore started his movement. As for the rest of your statement, you're a fool, he knows much more about science then you do, watch his movie. Hell I know much more about science then you do.the GW theory was brouht about by the failed president candidate, AL GORE. he knows...twat about science. the GWT is an ill thought out teory. the gas emissions from cars are causing the balance of nature to tilt? rofl.
Can I get a source? Nature has a way of balancing itself, the human contribution of CO2 are a disbalance, it is the same as your liver, it produces alcohol on its own and is fine, but if you drink liquor or beer your liver will suffer and eventually fail.bigger volcanic eruptions exhude more poisonous, more deadly, more thick gas emmisions than we have in recorded history. in fact, volcanos give out so much gas emissions that they dwarf the amount of gas emissions we can EVER HOPE TO ACHIEVE under 200 years.
Well, dinosaurs took SUV size craps daily, plus the meteorite fell that was the result of the ice age that brought an end to them, it took many years for the earth to fix the disbalance created by that meteorite. Btw, the hole in the ozone layer above the south pole is growing and growing.also, how do you suppose the ice from the ice ages melt out? there were no cars and SUVs in the ice age. this isnt certain but dinosaurs are very unlikely to invent cars and drivearound in them. the earth governs its balance and the GWT fails miserably. we are much less significant in the workkings of the earth than we think (exclude pollution).
Hmm...Im sure some guy on youtube has all the facts and Al Gore with his infinite resources doesn't. Its not like he is making money of of this, he is already rich, he is donating all his profits from his movie to his foundation.there are many many theories opposing te GWT, they just dont have the power to surface because of AL GORES superior media influence. go to youtube and search te user UTNOW. hes got a video on global warming. i found this while browsing for 'warming up your house' lol.
The estimate is that petrol will be gone by 2030, but thats not the point, the climate will start getting unlivable by 2025.btw, we havent even used half the amount of petrol on the earth yet. we have plenty of time left to find other solutions.
No sir, you fail.ALGORE YOU ****ING LOSER. YOU FAIL AT SCIENCE.
An interesting video everyone in the world should see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5g8cmWZOX8Q
Don't mind the subtitles, that was in a conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and the video's from the local TV. Portuguese subtitles
Still, I'm pretty sure you can all understand her, as she speaks english.
Sorry mate, but I think that theory is a lots of bollocks.Saying US is in the commanding seat for blame seems logical... but I am sure cherynobl ****ed a lot of shit up.
But I am less worried about global warming.... My real worry for 50-75 years down the road is the moon.
The moon in itself regulates out planets temperature, oceanic tides, and keeps our seasons in check. But through science we have discovered that year by year our moon is slowly leaving us. Albeit a very very small bit, an inch a year I believe, But once it leaves at a certain distance our whole Orbit and rotation is going to be thrown for a loop.
What happens in 75 maybe 100 years when the moon is far enough for the earth to make a grand enough tilt, over time mind you, to where our polar caps are in Direct line of the sun, visa ve our equator.
While this is a very very Rash theory it it happening at a very slow rate.... It would indeed take 100+ years for our axis to tilt to a noticeable degree but our climate will def be changing before of it just because of our Climate fluxuations.