Starcraft vs. Warcraft

a@...

Member!
Joined
May 26, 2003
Messages
846
Reaction score
0
Location
Tarsonis
AvalonX, You forgot something,

-High Templar's Psionic Storm

-Defiler's Plague
(wonderful magic to use against war3 Heroes)

-Science Vessels Irridiate
(Another wonderful magic to use against war3 Heroes)

-Queen's Spawn Broodling
(Rofl, any units can be killed except mechenical, so that means you can kill war3 heroes too)

And there're many more good spells from starcraft.
 

Lwek

Member!
Joined
May 18, 2003
Messages
4,487
Reaction score
0
Website
www.Battleforums.com
Terran Nuke
Lurker's Attack
Infested terran
Scourge
Siege Mode Siege Tank
Arbiter's Stasis Field and maybe recall for strategy
Civilian for decoy
 

Dw-Riot

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Messages
264
Reaction score
0
Location
Camden County, GA
True that, Master Virus. Starcraft definitely has Warcraft ownes...(opinionated statement, don't tell me I'm wrong because I'm NOT wrong. It's an opinion.);-)
 

betaalpha5

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2003
Messages
1,202
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
man no questio nsc would kill them. look at this they have ladders in order to get over a way. for usa put them in dropships or whatever and send them over. also not many units have splash (at least not the 1 i've seen but i dont really have wc) so and a few firebats would killa lot. they can only heal by some potion or soemthing and come on a few malstrom, storm and irradate since all units are organic. they would be dead. and i think just like terran bunkers u have to put units them to attack and repair. toss has regenreative shielding while zerg has auto heal. add a new medics no challenge. the only advantage that i could see is vs ghost. since they cna't use lockdown they are screwed. and the more 1 unit kills the harder it is to kill them
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2003
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Location
Watertown, Ny
Website
Visit site
Starcraft would own Warcraft, think about it, wtf is anything in the warcraft universe going to to to a maxed out battle cruiser or carrier? Zerg would be owned, their only hope woulld be the tourrasque... wich is not normally useable unless made in a ums map. the guardian/devourer might do sumthin too though.. an archon rush would take out any warcraft base in minutes... and there isnt anything warcraft woud do about photons...
 

betaalpha5

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2003
Messages
1,202
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
lol yeah and 1 other thing is even bunkers would be nice sees army comin firebats go sploosh 3 dead..4 dead rines range attack

and come on sci vessals. all wc units die! irrdate would kill them all.so what if they have a machine to see invis units. we have 1 just the same, but can even see the land in the area
 

RyanXWing

Nothing special
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Messages
2,204
Reaction score
1
Location
Seattle, WA.
This is actually a tough argument. StarCraft is a good classic very addicting, has awesome map maker. Warcraft has more complex things. Like multiple resources.. among others.

What it really comes down to is Do you like swords and Arrows? Or space ships hi-tech explosion bam back RAGHNARGHNAAGHRAGH! Attack!... Yeah... Sci-Fi VS. Fantasy
 

Aragorn7

Member!
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
3,907
Reaction score
0
Location
At My Computer, Where Else?
Starcraft would win because of the advanced weapons its races gets. It would be no contest.

Guns VS Swords = Starcraft wins.
 

FZ. | gOsu

Member!
Joined
May 21, 2003
Messages
566
Reaction score
0
Location
in front of computer
Website
Visit site
umm....starcraft races would win becuase all their units build faster and they have about the same hp, but starcraft units deal like 2 times more damage, and they attack faster, and its alot easier to make starcraft units...they take less resources, and gather them faster
 

betaalpha5

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2003
Messages
1,202
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
yeah and besides technology CAN defeat magic :D hella easy an arcer plz grab a snpier rifle. bam one shot one kill
 

KaDoKa

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston, MA
Website
Visit site
No way

COLOR=orange]there is no way wc would ever beat sc. Even if it was 3v4races the cost and quickness to build sc units is so much less. [/COLOR] :shoot
 

betaalpha5

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2003
Messages
1,202
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
also come on firebats would own them. the only thing that i say that would make an very long and intresting battle is zerg vs wc. i mean they both dont have a lot of tech so it would be an intresting matchup
 

KaDoKa

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston, MA
Website
Visit site
starcraft would reck warcraft The cost to build units is so much better and so is the time to spawn them. And gathering, well, in warcraft u gather so slow and in starcraft u can have infinite people to mine.
Heroes- They woulkd get wrecked. 1 hero couldnt take on 3 rines and a med
 

betaalpha5

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2003
Messages
1,202
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
if it was on a 3 vs 3 battle wher each player was one of the sc race.

terran tanks would blow ground units up. corsair would take the air and web those wathc tower. the zerg..... well a group could be irrdated and run stright into an enemy base. :)
 

KaDoKa

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston, MA
Website
Visit site
:shoot even if it was wc vs zerg sc would wineven if it was wc vs zerg sc would win so what if they dont have as much tech it doesnt matter because there is no way that wc can defend a ling rush or hydras and for shur there is nothing to beat lurkers. I dont even think that wc has detectors (i'm not shur about that statement so correct me if i'm wrong) but guards and lurks and RUSH no way wc would win.
 

NewPosts

New threads

Top