QuikSilver
Forum *********
But, still...what started it all? A cycle can not start all by itself no matter where it starts or ends....:doh:No, not really, it's a cycle, means that the end is the beginning.
But, still...what started it all? A cycle can not start all by itself no matter where it starts or ends....:doh:No, not really, it's a cycle, means that the end is the beginning.
man, its really simple...Things/cycles/whatever don't appear from nothing...They all should be traced back to an ultimate creatorThis is like a paper sack arguing with a golf ball about where mustard came from.
You don't seem to be understanding. I'll try to explain.man, its really simple...Things/cycles/whatever don't appear from nothing...They all should be traced back to an ultimate creator
Do you believe that something can appear from nothing? Even a time axis, it must have been set down by something/someone. A universe that repeats itself must have been set off by a creator. To me, this is the most logical explanation.You don't seem to be understanding. I'll try to explain.
In order to have a cycle, you need time. That because a cycle needs time. You do phase 1, then it goes to phase 2, then 3. That needs time to happen.
What I am saying is that this universe is a cycle where time has been reset. Meaning, we are repeating the universe. It's repeatable. Does not mean it is equal to the last one, or anything. Just that this one will also end, and another will rise.
This is one cosmological theory, it has not been proven true. But it makes far more sense than just thinking someone must have created it.
I have as personal belief that thinking some god must have created everything, and actually believe that without even trying to find other explanation, is no more than cowardice.
Now of course there's much more to religion than who or what created the world, so I don't mind people having it.
Just don't tell me it even makes sense that someone must have created it, because it doesn't. It's an explanation, somewhat plausible, but not credible. No proof of any kind, what so ever.
Why must it have set off by a creator? Why can't it be created by itself?Do you believe that something can appear from nothing? Even a time axis, it must have been set down by something/someone. A universe that repeats itself must have been set off by a creator. To me, this is the most logical explanation.
Religion is a different issue here. Actually, I currently am not following one...But, I do still truly believe there is a god... "intelligent designer"....
you wouldn't make it as a freemason!Why must it have set off by a creator? Why can't it be created by itself?
And, do read again, I didn't said I believe in this theory. Just that it is a theory, more credible than a god.
It couldn't be created by itself because it wasn't created yet!Why must it have set off by a creator? Why can't it be created by itself?
And, do read again, I didn't said I believe in this theory. Just that it is a theory, more credible than a god.
yes, my bad...And, do read again, I didn't said I believe in this theory. Just that it is a theory, more credible than a god.
That's the very definition of a cycle, the end is the beginning. It begins itself.It couldn't be created by itself because it wasn't created yet!
Refer to the pic I attached.That's the very definition of a cycle, the end is the beginning. It begins itself.
There are basics concepts you don't seem to understand here: the concept of infinity, and of how time is relative. Meaning, it can be transformed, or rather, can be observed, differently than what we experience it.Refer to the pic I attached.
edit: nevermind it didnt upload for some reason...
That definition of the cycle actually has nothing to do with what we are talking about. Yes, the beginning of the cycle is its actual ending at any point in the cycle. However, you can not conclude that it begins itself from day 1...In order for it to be a cycle that repeats itself, something must have initially started it.