Military Technology discussion

[Biske]

just another piece of US technology:

http://www.battelle.org/navy/railguns.pdf

That is awesome. Can anyone say "Metal Gear Solid"?

 

[Korittke]

M1A1 > T-95. You ask for a source? Computer games. I rely on them. Take Desert Combat. Just from that game i can tell you (from what I remember)

Abrams: better range, worse armor, turret 360 turnable, quicker, lighter, more versatile, more beautiful

 

[Kuzmich]

M1A1 > T-95. You ask for a source? Computer games. I rely on them. Take Desert Combat. Just from that game i can tell you (from what I remember)

Abrams: better range, worse armor, turret 360 turnable, quicker, lighter, more versatile, more beautiful

[glow=red]Games arent reliable sources, especially american games. They are too biased, T-95 been called best tank in the world.[/glow]

 

[Ashigaru]

[glow=red]Games arent reliable sources, especially american games. They are too biased, T-95 been called best tank in the world.[/glow]

So anything that says Russia isnt the best is biased...? :rolleyes

 

[Kuzmich]

[glow=red]No, but games are not reliable sources especially american games. If there has been an actualy test made that prooves that Abrams tank is better then T-95 then that info is not biased. But such test has been made and it prooved that T-95 is better then the american alternative.[/glow]