N00b General
Member
Oh my whoever said Bush hasnt put enough money into education is a total idiot. 'No child left behind plan' Jesus...
Voting for nader or any other small people is totally worthless since... even if you do agree with them, they arnt going to win, no matter what you do. Nader got less then 3% of the votes last year. Not worth voting for the little people, vote for either bush or kerry since they are the only two that have any chance of winning...
Kerry, well personaly i dont like most of his views or ideas. I just dont like what he thinks we can do. And if he intends to pull all the troups out of Iraq then we just spent billions and billions for nothing (I dont know if he does intend to do that i dont listen to much of his crap). Although I am starting to notice a trend between all the librals. Ask them 'Who are you voting for?' they go 'Kerry all the way!!!' really enthusiasticly , so I have to ask 'Well... why are you voting for him exactly?' only to be given the blank stare, and the worste reply ever 'Because I'm democratic!' What the hell? Are you an idiot? Thats not a reason thats ignorance. Although I'm sure there are Republicans that do the same, I just havn't met them yet.
As for Bush well I have to say he is the pick of this litter. If Gore had been in office, all the libral democrats would be saying 'The next eight years of our lives are going to suck.. why did we vote for this asshole?' and thats going through the idea that he would have run two terms (He wouldnt have lasted, impeached no doubt about it). Since we all know he would have been a wuss, and not gone into the war or try to get revenge for the few thousand dead innocent Americans. But hey... just my thoughts again. Bush at least is trying to make the world a less-shittier place by being in Iraq. And some of his ideas I can at least agree with. Heh. However I must agree he sucks at giving speeches, and has done many stupid things.
Voting for nader or any other small people is totally worthless since... even if you do agree with them, they arnt going to win, no matter what you do. Nader got less then 3% of the votes last year. Not worth voting for the little people, vote for either bush or kerry since they are the only two that have any chance of winning...
Kerry, well personaly i dont like most of his views or ideas. I just dont like what he thinks we can do. And if he intends to pull all the troups out of Iraq then we just spent billions and billions for nothing (I dont know if he does intend to do that i dont listen to much of his crap). Although I am starting to notice a trend between all the librals. Ask them 'Who are you voting for?' they go 'Kerry all the way!!!' really enthusiasticly , so I have to ask 'Well... why are you voting for him exactly?' only to be given the blank stare, and the worste reply ever 'Because I'm democratic!' What the hell? Are you an idiot? Thats not a reason thats ignorance. Although I'm sure there are Republicans that do the same, I just havn't met them yet.
As for Bush well I have to say he is the pick of this litter. If Gore had been in office, all the libral democrats would be saying 'The next eight years of our lives are going to suck.. why did we vote for this asshole?' and thats going through the idea that he would have run two terms (He wouldnt have lasted, impeached no doubt about it). Since we all know he would have been a wuss, and not gone into the war or try to get revenge for the few thousand dead innocent Americans. But hey... just my thoughts again. Bush at least is trying to make the world a less-shittier place by being in Iraq. And some of his ideas I can at least agree with. Heh. However I must agree he sucks at giving speeches, and has done many stupid things.