It came under the radar...

[Emperor Pan I]

Try RE2...I think thats the best5 thus far, I wasn't partial to the Tiberium Games, because I started in RE2 awhile back. I did have Generals for a bit...it's not like any blizzard games I've played.

Though the nuke on that game was kickass...

you just suck at video games

 

[Darkmatter]

How ever did you calculate that immerse conclusion!

 

[simpleforce]

first of all i dont know who told u theres 2500 countries..theres nearly 150, ur off by a couple dozen planets.

westwood and blizzard rts games are completey different, i dont even see how generals can be considered blizzard-like. supreme commander is good, i dont like it though, it seems like a age of empires in the future game. and age of empire sucks bad.

ive played all the westwood games, all the blizzard games, aoe, sc, and i have to say that warcraft3 is by far the best of rts's, then id have to give a tie between ra2/starcraft. generals blew it with the super weapons and unbalanced units.

 

[Emperor Pan I]

first off there are 245 countries in the world, and it wasn't 2500, that was a typo. anyone with half a brain could a figured that out.

Second if you have ever played Generals, it plays like every blizzard RTS, with drones to build buildings and the like. Nothing like other command and conquer games.

 

[Sogeking]

thats what i was feeling on c&c3. not that i didnt like c&c3 . go NOD !

 

[Ninja_Blue]

Guys, I heard Battle for Middle Earth II pwns.
Also Medeival 2 : Total War.
Doesn't always have to be futuristic games guys.

 

[Sogeking]

yes it does. halo warz

 

[Ninja_Blue]

Nah, Halo wars is gonna suck.
You just can't implement the Halo universe into an RTS.
Unless you have to do something special for Spartans, it's gonna suck with it's mechanics.

 

[Darkmatter]

Well...I've always been partial to future games since most of the early RTS's seem to go to medieval games instead.