If osma was caught..

bamthedoc

King Endymion
Joined
Oct 2, 2002
Messages
4,292
Reaction score
1
Location
North Carolina, USA
Website
www.fanfiction.net
My personal preferance for if and when we catch Osama bin Laden is:

1) Don't torture him. Why? Ever heard of the Geneva (sp?) Convention?
2) Try him State-Side (USA).
3) Send him to a specific Florida prison (explain later).
4) DON'T pursue the death penalty (agian, explain later).
5) My dad told me about this specific crimminal in the Floridian prison I want ObL sent to ;)
6) We can now watch him suffer without torturing him ;)
 

jd-inflames

Melodic Murderer
Joined
Oct 2, 2003
Messages
6,014
Reaction score
6
Location
My Sanctuary
Website
www.cursedprophets.com
torture is kinda...unconstitutional. so in otherwords, they would send him to texas. they have the express lane on the death penalty so he wouldnt be a problem much longer ;)
 

Final Warrior

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2002
Messages
1,909
Reaction score
0
Location
In you, of course.
Website
www.harkkonnen.com
Okay, things you uneducated people should know (excluding BAM):
1. Due to the Geneva Convention TORTURE IS NOT ALLOWED ANYMORE. It was originally for wars only, but then spread to anytime, anywhere (correct me on this if I'm wrong)

2. Osama is more likely to commit suicide. (Again, correct me, but only if you have a valid explanation)

3. How are you humans gonna catch him? After all, I haven't seen any flooded caves lately. All the US troops are concentrated in Iraq looking for *clears throat* "weapons of mass destruction."

It's more likely that BAM's idea is going to happen. Plus, there are a lot of people against capital punishment...
 

bamthedoc

King Endymion
Joined
Oct 2, 2002
Messages
4,292
Reaction score
1
Location
North Carolina, USA
Website
www.fanfiction.net
1. Due to the Geneva Convention TORTURE IS NOT ALLOWED ANYMORE. It was originally for wars only, but then spread to anytime, anywhere (correct me on this if I'm wrong)
I don't believe it extends outside POWs, and that's what Osama bin Laden would be. Well...a "head of state" POW, anyway.

2. Osama is more likely to commit suicide. (Again, correct me, but only if you have a valid explanation)
I believe he's as much a coward as Saddam Hussien. Sure both have actual blood on thier hands, but that's always with some sort of "gang" to support them. I think the Iraqis would beat Saddam to a pulp before he committed suicide -- and same goes with Osame (execpt replace Iraqi with American or Afganistanian)

3. How are you humans gonna catch him? After all, I haven't seen any flooded caves lately. All the US troops are concentrated in Iraq looking for *clears throat* "weapons of mass destruction."[/B]
"you humans"? Okay...
FYI: We have troops in Afganistan searching... I have a personal beleif that Osama may have moved with the mass of Al Queda currently in or going to Iraq. Who knows, we might catch two birds in one country -- at different times, of course ;)

As per capitol punishment: I'm for it. However, Osama is one of those cases where I see the death penelty as more reprocution producing than useful. If he's alive and "surrended", it plays major morale decay for loyalists. In Saddam's case, he has to be tried and killed by his people, no ifs, ands, or buts. It will serve a very positive morale boost for a stabalizing force in the Middle East. It's just the way this drama seems to be playing out, and as was predicted by many who have studied the mind-set of people in/of the Middle East.
 

liqu1d_g0at

Member!
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Messages
906
Reaction score
0
Location
miami
Website
Visit site
if we EVER catch him that is.......
i'd make a llama spit on his face and then bite off his balls and use them as a necklace
 

Dark Exploit

Member!
Joined
Jan 25, 2003
Messages
223
Reaction score
0
Website
legendsofAsheron.org
i would keep him in a cage by my house for fun and make people pay to see him and they could beat on him
 

VegetaClam

Member!
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,204
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
Every 100 plus American lives lost to terrorists, One Nuke should be sent over. Oh but they don't have a country? Send it to the one they are hiding in or the one that they came from. They will get the hint that American lives come at a huge cost. No country in there right mind would harbor such people if this was our stand. Terrorists play hard ball and kill innocent people, we must be willing to take it to any level just like them. It's an ugly world we have to be just as ugly.

-VC
 

Metal Gear Flash

LaLiLuLeLo
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
3,293
Reaction score
13
Location
Lone Star State
once my mother told me....

"two lefts dont make a right".....or is it wrongs?

anywho, think if we nuked a county, like you said, that they came from or are hiding in....we would kill people from other countries and that would start a world war and crap....no good can come from throwing nukes like they are babies
 

VegetaClam

Member!
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,204
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
Who's going to want to start a war with the US? A war with the US and no one wins. We Throw a bunch of nukes in the air, you die. If you have nukes you send yours back at us before you die, then we die. If you don't have nukes you just die. No one wants to risk that over the lives of terrorists or a handful of your country men living in a terrorist friendly country.

-VC
 

Khull

Premium Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
1,701
Reaction score
0
Location
Pennsylvania
Launching nukes in the air isnt the answer. . . that damages good land and escalates into a nuclear war. I belive somewhere theres a document that states that its banned to use nukes, I might be wrong.
 

bamthedoc

King Endymion
Joined
Oct 2, 2002
Messages
4,292
Reaction score
1
Location
North Carolina, USA
Website
www.fanfiction.net
The document of which you speak is something to the effect of the UN Weapons Pact. It bans all weapons that can be used to kill a large number of people en masse. That includes nuclear, biological, and chemical. It also bans S.C.U.D.S. and long range ballistic missles. The US F-22 Raptor carries the maximum range missle in it's hold, if I'm not mistaken.

As for not killing Saddam... It would be more of a mistake not to let the Iraqis kill him. It would be a boon to them, and it's not going to help moralize loyalists -- they'll be scared of the people they tortured for so long. I take things case by case and look at the scenario played out. I don't want Osama dead or torutured (martyrdom), but I do want him to suffer the rest of his living days. It won't lead to martyrdom if he's imprissoned for the rest of his life -- and in a Floridian jail no less ;) I'll get the name of the prison and man he should be imprissoned with later ;)
 

Final Warrior

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2002
Messages
1,909
Reaction score
0
Location
In you, of course.
Website
www.harkkonnen.com
Many good points. And believe me VegetaClam, one nuke could destory this world:

1. US launches nuke at country. US is expelled from UN for attacking a whole country without being provoked.

2. US would be attacked sooner or later, because many people would hate it (for unprovokedly attacking a country). Most likely another 9/11 or nuke.

3. US would strike back with more nukes.

4. Everyone else begins fighting with nuclear bombs.

5. World War 3: Nucler Missiles and Bio Bombs.

6. The world is turned into a lifeless ball, floating in space. All because the US decided to launch a nuke at an innocent country that was SUSPECTED of harbouring terrorists.
 
B

Bizzy Bon345

dood... i live in texas if u throw osam ova here... we get our sharpshooters and shoot him to death then spit on him (with tobacco juice) and give a proper burial(thrown to a pack of wild wolves)

Texas truly owns
 

TrongaMonga

Grumpy Old Grandpa
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
10,126
Reaction score
41
Location
Portugal
The best way to torture Osama is to have Bush telling him some jokes.
 

NewPosts

New threads

Top