HU~ riflemen or dragonhawks

[Oliok14]

Rifles are quick to build and Rifles can lost along time when your Allys areMelee

 

[Samsara]

well hawks cost the same amount and are flying, making them alot harder to kill

and you should always treat a team game as a solo game, so you can depend on your own strength instead of the skills of others

 

[QuikSilver]

and you should always treat a team game as a solo game, so you can depend on your own strength instead of the skills of others

Well not always....Maybe sometimes... You will then totally contradict ur posts in the previous thread(Poll: 2 vs 2)

 

[Oliok14]

Lol, yeah, i would go Dragon Hawks, but i love my rifles, They are the superior unit...

 

[None293823]

Originally posted by noob_phucker
and you should always treat a team game as a solo game, so you can depend on your own strength instead of the skills of others

I've always played together when harassing because sometimes if your team mate isnt good, you cant divide to 1v1 in 2v2 game or even 3v3. Otherwise if you see he's good and if you can play in 1v1 you dont give them any chance since you own them both at the same time

 

[Samsara]

well i still believe that "divide and conquer" is the best way to win a match. as in go harrass alone until the ally is forced to tp to his ally's aid and that is when your ally goes to whomp on his base. savvy?

the only time i would worry about "sticking together" is late tier2 and tier3.

 

[thegame]

You are right.. it is a very effective strategy unless their ally has towered his base. That is when this strategy fails.

 

[Samsara]

well its kinda hard to have 2+ towers up and running when i have an arch mage and 3 foots beating up their base.

 

[None293823]

yes besides all, I told you i dont like it when you have to divide just because you may play a noob who doesnt know what to do.

Otherwise , im with you this is th best way - in 2v2 dividing is the best even in 3v3. In 4v4 either to 1 v1 or to 2v2