Existance remains to be questioned.

[Orcryst]

Originally posted by CelestialBadger
I'm not "mudslinging". Like you said though, I reread your post and remain unconvinced that I originally misinterpereted it. I didn't miss your message at all. In fact, I'm sharing my ideas with you just like you wanted.

Nowhere in the quote that I responded to did you say anything about an answer not being good without a question. All you said is that you can't be sure whether your question has been answered because the "connection [between] question and answer" is created by humans.

Because the connection of 'question' and 'answer' have rules (rules are applied and created my humans), and as you stated, 'their own definitions'. I did say, though, that the answer may never be conclusive without these rules, therefore, the question I asked was not in a closed context, it was not a question-answer, it was a question meant to trigger other questions. Other opinions, also, that provoce even MORE questions. I ALSO said that I like questions slightly better than answers... any questions?

((EDIT)) : By the way, telling me not to be stupid because of what I said is considered mudslinging. You don't have to say "nice ta' see ya, @#$%*!" to degrade what someone has said.

 

[Biske]

So basicly, you're screwed, because the only sentient life forms you can communicate with are humans, but being human we are imperfect, thus our answers will never give you what you want, correct? Well, I'm sure there's a hotline to God in the phone book.

 

[Orcryst]

No, you obviously didn't read the whole thread, I believe I mentioned earlier that I was not searching for any direct answer, was searching for the opinions, and the ideas of others.