darden
Member!
i just don't get, whats all the fun in it, ITS JUST DRAWINGS
any ideas?
any ideas?
Thats always been a moral issue in and of itself. Indeed, people have since god knows when debated what's art and what's pornography.ITS JUST DRAWINGS
Originally posted by darden
you misunderstood my question, Mr. Know-it-all. By animated porn i don't mean a paiting of a nude woman picking up apples from the ground
and you can see i said "an·i·mat·ed (tr.v. ) To impart motion or activity to)
i don't undestand how people get on, watching it
and i am not saying , its wrong or right, just wanna know hwat anybody else thinks
There we go^^^, a perfect example of how we all interpret things differently. We're all subjected to our own subjective experiences, we're all faced with ambiguous situations in which we make a decision in our interpretation of the situation, NOT "We can do anything".you mean we can do anything?? but it still can be wrong, and yes there's a difference in animated porn and so called by you regular.
They serve a similar purpose don't they? Sexual gratification. You still release sperm when you masturbate. You still get that dopamine boost when you masturbate. The difference here isn't if its real or imaginary (the please isn't imaginary in the least), its whether or not you can have babies. Sexual intercourse=procreation, masturbation=something else entirely.One is real the other is pure imagination, do you really wanna masturbate to someones drawings
sexual intercourse is an act, and animated drawings or just drawings are made up
Generalizing now, are we? How do you know. Support your argument. It might be clear in your mind, but the assertion that most people don't go to pornographic sites to appreciate the art isn't valid if you don't support it.and people going to those site don't go there to a appreciate the beautiful art work, atleast not most
Wow! You can repeat whats already been said! What are you arguing? debates sort of work through arguments, not pointless statements. (see? the previous sentence is an argument, I'm arguing that your post lacks an argument, lacks a dominant thrust in any specific direction)and art is made for a reason, if you create something with inention of it being art, it will be art
but to act out your fantasy of seeing animated characters in sexual intercourse, will it be art???
Note the little "see previous post" note in my post? Or did you miss that too? I repeated it for YOUR benefit since you obviously missed that part the first time I posted it. Heck, even you agreelike yours don't, you are saying it over and over,
Stop contradicting yourself.sorry i didn't see that
lol...k, you seriously need to learn a bit on argumentative fallacies. Once again, Ad Hominem is NOT a valid argumentative strategy (i think this is the second or third time I've had to say this). Just for your info, I'm against porn, it goes against my religion.if you like animated pornthat much just say it and we will close this topic