Voting For President? GO GREEN!

[DeathRingerTheSilent]

I'm afraid the real campaigns were back before all this mud slinging. The presidential canidates sicken me. They could just tell everyone exactly what they are going to do and do it. If they did that then they would be re-elected. They also need to keep their social life under control (e.g. Bill Clinton, or actions such as :wasted ). I believe the best policy is that of telling everyone exactly what you'll do, carry it out or explain why you can't, and don't sling mud. Those who sling mud have more dirt reflected on them than the one who's the target.

 

[Forged]

votenader.org

 

[betaalpha5]

i'll vote for al sharpton for 2 reasons
1. where i live democrates kinda rule so kerry would most likey be voted for so doesn't hurt to get al the 5%
2. i'll play the race card.

 

[foolz]

voting for someone other than democrat or republican is pretty much a ****in' wasted vote.

 

[Forged]

voting for someone other than democrat or republican is pretty much a ****in' wasted vote.

Voting for someone other than a republican in the state of texas is pretty much a waist of a vote. However I don't care if I win, I am not scared to vote for the loser.

 

[Lights]

voting for someone other than democrat or republican is pretty much a ****in' wasted vote.

Only because there are so many who think like that.
People are followers.

 

[N[U]TS]

lol i heard somthing the other night on letterman i think..... he said that nader has like 1% of the nations vote and with that.... even 2% milk is beating him or somthing of that sort pretty funny though

Voting for someone other than a republican in the state of texas is pretty much a waist of a vote.

yea i dont see any signs at all for kerry in texas.... pretty funny :dance

 

[Forged]

he said that nader has like 1% of the nations vote and with that

Last year nader got like 4% of the vote, if he were allowed to debate he would do much beter. The DemoPublicans control the news though so nothing about 3rd partys is shown on the news.

When Perot was allowed to debate in 92 he went from around 3% to 22% of the vote. Since then the DemoPublicans haven't let the 3rd partys debate.

Their reason of course was with all of the other partys it was inane to allow it. However there are only 3 solid 3rd partys, so 5 people could easilly debate and their point is void.

 

[c9h13no3]

Ralph Nader scares me more than Kerry or Bush. His views on the WTO and NAFTA will kill us.

A third party that actually has a chance to win will have to come from the middle.

Now where's CB's sig when you need it?

 

[jd-inflames]

A lot of people like him cause he believes in the same as NORML...

I've heard rumours that Kerry wants to pull the troops out...but then again rumors in these stupid debates are never true, and you never know what you are going to get.

I'm sitting out this year sadly. I care for neither of these people. I liked Clinton, I want him back

 

[DeathRingerTheSilent]

I think Forged is right. If third party canidates were allowed publicity then there would be more than two parties in power... WAIT now that I think about it if one of the parties loses power long enough we could end up in as bad as a system as we were in before The Constitution... or worse... we may disolve and become A COLONY!!! AHHHH!!! This has got to be corrected! We need a the third parties to make it all even out.

 

[shutupandgoaway]

Yeah, Nader would knock the pants off of Bush and Kerry in the debate. If he could debate, he'd probably shave off the progressive dems.

 

[Lights]

Bush is an excellent debator.
Odd, because he is such a poor free speaker.
Kerry wont debate well due to his self-contradictory nature.

 

[CelestialBadger]

Ralph Nader scares me more than Kerry or Bush. His views on the WTO and NAFTA will kill us.

A third party that actually has a chance to win will have to come from the middle.

Now where's CB's sig when you need it?

You should be libertarian c9.

 

[ORC-r0x0r-ROC]

Bush is an excellent debator.
Odd, because he is such a poor free speaker.

Because not all the public have scripts and set responses arn't always available.

 

[c9h13no3]

You should be libertarian c9.

Who says I'm not?

 

[Forged]

If I were rational I would be a libertarian, unfortunatlly I have a soul.

 

[CelestialBadger]

I just figured if you were Libertarian you would be voting for Badnarik.

If I were rational I would be a libertarian, unfortunatlly I have a soul.

?

 

[mesiahofpenguins]

I wish edwards would have won the nomination I hate kerry I am a conservative but I did like edwards a lot. and why to liberals like clinton so much i'm not saying he was a bad president but he wasn't that good of one either.

 

[shutupandgoaway]

A lot of Liberals didn't like Clinton; it's just that we realized the alternative- the intolerant, anti immigrant Bob Dole.