Post Acc's Here

[Above_70Percent]

I've made a post about who is the best, and people been sayin this shit and that shit. Here is the deal, post your best account here and we will see who is truly is better .

Uh i have tft but i prefer to play RoC but my RoC acc= Miekeke Azeroth Realm, I would put a hyperlink but don't know how to

 

[NeverGoingBack]

use the vB Code help link to learn that kinda stuff

help

pointless anyone can post someone else's account

 

[QuikSilver]

my acc is way too crappy to post...haha

 

[OMGLOLWTFPWN]

MagicalFairy, yep thats my account.

 

[Frost: The Angel]

*Sigh*


Warmonger-
&
Artofwar.​

 

[QuikSilver]

your accounts have 0 wins 0 losses...why??

 

[Frost: The Angel]

Neglected to mention... Azeroth TFT.​

 

[Above_70Percent]

lol u gotta put that

 

[QuikSilver]

Im sorry i forgot about the (.) and the (-) after those names!!! I was actually in the right gateway

 

[Samsara]

my account: cheap_shot on azeroth

 

[Ntrik_]

sigh

its always sad to see ppl who doesnt look at the stickies.. we already have thread like this... =/

also, can you guys like make the link to your ladder webpage? its kinda annoying to jus go to the website all by myself.. i got lost too

anyways heres Mine

 

[Samsara]

Note: only look at my human score if you ever do look. I had fun doing alot of experiments (mass banshee and mass talon+mg)

btw, why are we doing this here instead of the stickied one?

 

[None293823]

My accounts are in my sig.If you think numbers can give you the idea who is better between people here ,i strongly disagree.

here's the rule: judge people to their numbers then play vs the one you claim is weak and then define him as weak.

 

[Torubu]

Originally posted by Dark Mage
My accounts are in my sig.If you think numbers can give you the idea who is better between people here ,i strongly disagree.

here's the rule: judge people to their numbers then play vs the one you claim is weak and then define him as weak.

If you're good, you'll get a good record. If you're bad, you'll get a bad record. It's common sense, please use some. Sure, there is a luck element in WC3, but luck won't give you a good record.

 

[Aragorn7]

Originally posted by Torubu
If you're good, you'll get a good record. If you're bad, you'll get a bad record. It's common sense, please use some. Sure, there is a luck element in WC3, but luck won't give you a good record.

In 4v4 luck can get you a good record or a bad one.

 

[Above_70Percent]

N_legend the sticky is just to put any acc's on, but here is to see who is best of best but people can just lie lolz....

Newayz, people keep sayin aragorn and phucker are so great, u guys wanna do a ffa with me?

 

[Emperor Pan I]

Originally posted by Torubu
If you're good, you'll get a good record. If you're bad, you'll get a bad record. It's common sense, please use some. Sure, there is a luck element in WC3, but luck won't give you a good record.

That is wrong, and the most narrowminded view on war3. That makes you look ignorant and a noob.

I own people daily who have 80%+. I only am at 50%+.

I could own u.

Winas and loses are just numbers, u lose a game doesn't mean u suck.

Take me for example, Pan_the_man is my account, It was my FIRST and ONLY account. I Started palying on this accouunt, when i was a noob which accounts for my loses. Yet i can still own those record concious losers.

Ppl who make new accounts cause they don't like loses, are truely noobs and should n't be playing the game if u cant take the fact u have lost games b4.

Yes Im talking to you aragorn7 or 8 whatever u think u are

 

[AHappyChineseBoy]

no dude, record reflects skill, of course some people just like to stick with their records but it doesnt mean that theyre newbs.

if you have a positive record, as in 50-10 then you're prolly good
if you have an okay record, as in 50-35 then you're prolly decent
if you have a shitty ass record as in, 50-80 then you're prolly sucky or atleast learning a bit more.

If you have a record like 100-96, then you're prolly experienced or first acct, which i'm assuming is how your record looks like, pan.

 

[Forged]

Originally posted by AHappyChineseBoy
no dude, record reflects skill, of course some people just like to stick with their records but it doesnt mean that theyre newbs.

if you have a positive record, as in 50-10 then you're prolly good
if you have an okay record, as in 50-35 then you're prolly decent
if you have a shitty ass record as in, 50-80 then you're prolly sucky or atleast learning a bit more.

If you have a record like 100-96, then you're prolly experienced or first acct, which i'm assuming is how your record looks like, pan.

I could go 90% if I at whored, I am not that good but I could get a good partner and get him to keep changeing his name, and rape lvl1 aters...

 

[AHappyChineseBoy]

AT is totally different, people with different skills play it, and people who know each other and have a general strat planned down. I am talking about solo stats,( Maybe i shouldve specified?) because in solo its completely dependent on you. it's highly unlikely that youve gone through 20 games in solo and havent found someone that has been matched with equal skill to yours. rt doesnt count, because part of the whole game is what kind of partners you get.

So if youve played through solo, its more then likely, if you have a good record that your a good player