On a scale of 1-10 how would you rate George Bush's performance as president?

On a scale of 1-10 how would you rate George Bush's performance as president?

  • 1 (worst)

    Votes: 10 22.7%
  • 2

    Votes: 4 9.1%
  • 3

    Votes: 8 18.2%
  • 4

    Votes: 7 15.9%
  • 5

    Votes: 6 13.6%
  • 6

    Votes: 2 4.5%
  • 7

    Votes: 4 9.1%
  • 8

    Votes: 1 2.3%
  • 9

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 10 (best)

    Votes: 2 4.5%

  • Total voters
    44

Taligaro

Furyan Merc
Joined
Jul 17, 2004
Messages
462
Reaction score
0
As someone who hates voting, isn't registered to vote, and will never vote. I give the moronic retarded jackass a -10. Anyone who gives this pile of horse shit anything higher then a 5 is obviously from the same damn gene pool as Bush.
 

RiX

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2002
Messages
1,435
Reaction score
0
Location
Vancouver, B.C.
Website
thelazyshopper.wwdb.biz
As someone who hates voting, isn't registered to vote, and will never vote. I give the moronic retarded jackass a -10. Anyone who gives this pile of horse shit anything higher then a 5 is obviously from the same damn gene pool as Bush.
lol. thats harsh. Im not sure if you notice. 1-10 are the only choices. unless you put 1-10 but forgot to put the 1 im not sure you rated him.

o btw you pulled a bush.

haha just messin.
 

Teh_Pwner

Member!
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
233
Reaction score
0
Location
Wyoming
As someone who hates voting, isn't registered to vote, and will never vote. I give the moronic retarded jackass a -10. Anyone who gives this pile of horse shit anything higher then a 5 is obviously from the same damn gene pool as Bush.
Your a hippy, aren't you?
 

Arkillo

The best of both worlds
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
10,653
Reaction score
6
Website
myspace.com
:rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes
As someone who hates voting, isn't registered to vote, and will never vote. I give the moronic retarded jackass a -10. Anyone who gives this pile of horse shit anything higher then a 5 is obviously from the same damn gene pool as Bush.
Yeah, because you'de do SO much better as president.
 

x42bn6

Retired Staff
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Messages
15,150
Reaction score
2
Location
London, United Kingdom
:rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes

Yeah, because you'de do SO much better as president.
But then again, would you really want to be...

I'd give him a 3 because he has done some good things for the United States, but because he has caused so much damage across the world in doing so. Are you aware, Mr. Bush, that I am living right next to one of the sites bombed in the July 7 bombing attacks in London? I blame that on you.*
 

RoaCh of DisCord

Premium Member
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
6,502
Reaction score
14
I'd give him a 3, and that's being generous.
 

x42bn6

Retired Staff
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Messages
15,150
Reaction score
2
Location
London, United Kingdom
That's my point.

The point is, London wouldn't have been a target had it not been involved in Iraq and Afghanistan. Started by the President himself.

Maybe it sounds unreasonable, but his face just makes me want to insult him.*
 

Teh_Pwner

Member!
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
233
Reaction score
0
Location
Wyoming
That's my point.

The point is, London wouldn't have been a target had it not been involved in Iraq and Afghanistan. Started by the President himself.

Maybe it sounds unreasonable, but his face just makes me want to insult him.*
Perhaps you wouldn't have been attacked if Tony Blair hadn't gone in, it is no way Bush's fault. And besides every war has sacrifices, the end justifies the means.
 

TrongaMonga

Grumpy Old Grandpa
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
10,126
Reaction score
41
Location
Portugal
A 0 out of American0.
 

RoaCh of DisCord

Premium Member
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
6,502
Reaction score
14
the end justifies the means.
That's debatable. And what exactly is the "end" of this "war"? The way I see it..we went in, ****ed with a weakening country, made them weaker, and screwed them up worse than they were before. Statistically, they were actually better off when Saddam was in power. Plus, I'm guessing in a few years we'll end up leaving Iraq because we've created an irreversible problem...making all the lives lost on both sides, utterly pointless. I see the future of Iraq at this point as pretty grim. That in itself makes Bush a pretty crappy president. He had little justification to start the "War"...came out finding no weapons of mass destruction, and decided to conveniently direct everyones attention to Saddam...making it "seem" like there was some point.
 

NewPosts

New threads

Top