lol. thats harsh. Im not sure if you notice. 1-10 are the only choices. unless you put 1-10 but forgot to put the 1 im not sure you rated him.As someone who hates voting, isn't registered to vote, and will never vote. I give the moronic retarded jackass a -10. Anyone who gives this pile of horse shit anything higher then a 5 is obviously from the same damn gene pool as Bush.
Your a hippy, aren't you?As someone who hates voting, isn't registered to vote, and will never vote. I give the moronic retarded jackass a -10. Anyone who gives this pile of horse shit anything higher then a 5 is obviously from the same damn gene pool as Bush.
Yeah, because you'de do SO much better as president.As someone who hates voting, isn't registered to vote, and will never vote. I give the moronic retarded jackass a -10. Anyone who gives this pile of horse shit anything higher then a 5 is obviously from the same damn gene pool as Bush.
But then again, would you really want to be...:rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes :rolleyes
Yeah, because you'de do SO much better as president.
That was the terrorists...Are you aware, Mr. Bush, that I am living right next to one of the sites bombed in the July 7 bombing attacks in London? I blame that on you.*
In 2001 the terrorists attacked us and we had not been at war with the middle east for over 10 years.Who wouldn't have done so had there not been so many stupid wars.*
Perhaps you wouldn't have been attacked if Tony Blair hadn't gone in, it is no way Bush's fault. And besides every war has sacrifices, the end justifies the means.That's my point.
The point is, London wouldn't have been a target had it not been involved in Iraq and Afghanistan. Started by the President himself.
Maybe it sounds unreasonable, but his face just makes me want to insult him.*
That's debatable. And what exactly is the "end" of this "war"? The way I see it..we went in, ****ed with a weakening country, made them weaker, and screwed them up worse than they were before. Statistically, they were actually better off when Saddam was in power. Plus, I'm guessing in a few years we'll end up leaving Iraq because we've created an irreversible problem...making all the lives lost on both sides, utterly pointless. I see the future of Iraq at this point as pretty grim. That in itself makes Bush a pretty crappy president. He had little justification to start the "War"...came out finding no weapons of mass destruction, and decided to conveniently direct everyones attention to Saddam...making it "seem" like there was some point.the end justifies the means.