Kerry?

[Forged]

I have seen some of this guys interviews from the past and now, and he seems to be just about as bad as bush. Why was he choosen, it seems like Kuninch(sp?) would have been the best choice, he could get the democratic and the green vote. The dems always complain that the greens screw them over, why not help themselves out by electing someone they can both agree on?

 

[Lights]

Just about? I would say 245287234719x worse, but thats a conservative republican speaking.

Seriously though, in the other thread "Bush vs. Kerry" I've shown a few of the mans problems, but everyday he adds upon them ferociously. The odd thing about the democratic primaries, is that they werent voting for who they liked the best or who they thought had the best plan; they were voting for who had the best chance of beating Bush. I find it somewhat sad.

 

[ORC-r0x0r-ROC]

Vote for the person who has the best chance of beating bush, hmm not that bad of a plan as long as the person is better than Bush I don't really mind, just get rid of bush the ****er.

 

[Ciphus]

Well the Dems obviously weren't too worried about beating Bush. Edwards had a better chance at beating Bush. Hell, I'm a die-hard republican that loves Bush, but Edwards impressed me. That guy kept a positive compaign and did a great job. I hope he gets Kerry's VP bid.

 

[Steven22]

Originally posted by Forged
I have seen some of this guys interviews from the past and now, and he seems to be just about as bad as bush. Why was he choosen, it seems like Kuninch(sp?) would have been the best choice, he could get the democratic and the green vote. The dems always complain that the greens screw them over, why not help themselves out by electing someone they can both agree on?

Kucinich I believe. And I agree with you. All Kerry has done is slander Bush. Heck, I can do that too. Kerry's campaign hasn't managed to produce some real solutions. And I find it very contradictory that he is against war, yet he wants to send more troops to Iraq...?
I think both of them are terrible choices.

 

[BigShot]

id personally prefer bush to remain in office, we just recovered from a war effort so why change a president to confuse it even more!?

 

[RoaCh of DisCord]

...and that's EXACTLY how bush wants us Americans to think. We're safe and secure with his little war efforts! He's the superman fighting world terrorism! We better vote him back into office to be safe!

I don't buy it. I actually feel very unsafe, having him as a president.

 

[dust601]

i feel better having him there then someone whos gonna second guess his way through office.

kerrys been making personal insults at bush, saying people are speaking ill of him, they ask kerry whos been saying it and kerry says its not relevent? wtf

 

[ORC-r0x0r-ROC]

i feel better having him there then someone whos gonna second guess his way through office.

kerrys been making personal insults at bush, saying people are speaking ill of him, they ask kerry whos been saying it and kerry says its not relevent? wtf

Urm, 2nd guessing is better than sticking with something wrong.

People are speaking ill of Bush, most people do. Maybe kerry said "it isn't relevant" to avoid naming groups of people (including gays) for a year.

 

[Forged]

Originally posted by BigShot
id personally prefer bush to remain in office, we just recovered from a war effort so why change a president to confuse it even more!?

Because this president is consider by every other country besides maybe Great Britian as they are pretty ****ed up atm to be the biggest threat to world peace since Stalin.

 

[Lights]

Originally posted by Forged
the biggest threat to world peace since Stalin.

Heh, but therein lies a problem.

Last I checked, Saddam's invading in other countries and refusing to backdown is not peaceful. I also do not believe buildings being bombed and trains blown-up peaceful.

Some people still sit in a shroud of disbelieve of the problems facing the world. People still believe the world was peaceful and still is peaceful, it isnt. Only, it is closer now that Saddam has been dispelled and will be closer still after we reign in the terror.

 

[shutupandgoaway]

Kerry is far too conservative. He is not as bad as Bush, but only by an incredibly small margin. In electability, Edwards is far better, and in views, Kucinich is by far the most non Bush candidate. The mystery is, why the hell did the stupid dems nominate Kerry!If theyre going for good ideas, its Kucinich, if theyre going for beat Bush, it should be Edwards!

 

[Forged]

Originally posted by Lights
Heh, but therein lies a problem.

Last I checked, Saddam's invading in other countries and refusing to backdown is not peaceful. I also do not believe buildings being bombed and trains blown-up peaceful.

Some people still sit in a shroud of disbelieve of the problems facing the world. People still believe the world was peaceful and still is peaceful, it isnt. Only, it is closer now that Saddam has been dispelled and will be closer still after we reign in the terror.

Bushes got his his finger on the button, suddam doesn't even have a button.

 

[CelestialBadger]

Looking at it from a different angle, perhaps a conservative democrat is what is needed to beat Bush.

 

[Tempest Storm]

Originally posted by shutupandgoaway
Kerry is far too conservative. He is not as bad as Bush, but only by an incredibly small margin. In electability, Edwards is far better, and in views, Kucinich is by far the most non Bush candidate. The mystery is, why the hell did the stupid dems nominate Kerry!If theyre going for good ideas, its Kucinich, if theyre going for beat Bush, it should be Edwards!

Actually, Kerry has the most liberal voting record in the Senate. Even more liberal than Kennedy.

Course, the ****er's a 2 sided fence-sitter that can't stick with one opinion.

I'ld have loved in Liberman got the vote, that guy looked pretty cool. But now we have to choose betwen Bush and Kerry.

Thing is...I can't decide who'se the lesser evil...

 

[GlockHolliday]

the only democrat i would ever have ever voted for was lieberman, and i cant even spell his name right half the time.

who is up for my idea of bringing McCarthy back from the dead and having him be the republican candidate and noam chomskey be the democrat candidate for presidency

 

[Forged]

Yeah McCarthy thats what we need.

Are you serious? Hard to convey sarcasm over the net...

 

[GlockHolliday]

no wasnt serious lol. i cant imagine mccarthy and chomsky(sp?) lasting in the same room together for more than 5 minutes without killing each other

 

[jackalopes]

Originally posted by Lights
Just about? I would say 245287234719x worse, but thats a conservative republican speaking.

Seriously though, in the other thread "Bush vs. Kerry" I've shown a few of the mans problems, but everyday he adds upon them ferociously. The odd thing about the democratic primaries, is that they werent voting for who they liked the best or who they thought had the best plan; they were voting for who had the best chance of beating Bush. I find it somewhat sad.

couldnt have said it better. lol