Kennedy Assassination

IDefy

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
May 10, 2003
Messages
4,034
Reaction score
0
Many think it was a conspiracy covered up by serveral government agencies and the Warren Commission. In the video I recently saw in my American History class showed 3 shots fired in under 6 seconds. From where Oswals was positioned there is no way he could've fired 3 shots that fast and that accurate with the calibur of rifle he was using.

What is your opinion?
 

Speaker

Premium Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2003
Messages
2,808
Reaction score
2
Location
Computer
i guess that wpould be true. Using science to help this is a HUGE help. If u do think about it, once the fiorst shot went off sum1 would be right there to get him and kennedy would be bein protectded and therefore there is no really good explanation for him to shoot 3 very accurately.
 

VegetaClam

Member!
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,204
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
It was a Long shot and a moving Target to boot. With an old Italian army surplus man licker. He didn't act alone.

No, I'm not saying I took a shot...

-VC
 

OMGLOLWTFPWN

Member!
Joined
Jun 15, 2003
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
Website
Visit site
I doubt it's a conspiracy. But it was the president, so there is a good chance a group of guys were working together and only one got busted. Oh and did you just hear 3 shots or did all three hit him?
 

IDefy

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
May 10, 2003
Messages
4,034
Reaction score
0
There have been rumors from the CIA, to the mod or to communist suporters. Suspicious men were sighted standing behind a fence with a clear shot at Kennedy, however they were dressed in police uniforms and were never questioned/captured.
 

IDefy

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
May 10, 2003
Messages
4,034
Reaction score
0
He was going to terminate the CIA. That is why.
 

Forged

Premium Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2002
Messages
5,433
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
Website
www.securegamers.com
we watched two videos in history, the zapruder film and another one that talked about how his autopsy was diffrent than the wound the people on the scene had seen.
 

IDefy

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
May 10, 2003
Messages
4,034
Reaction score
0
Originally posted by Forged
we watched two videos in history, the zapruder film and another one that talked about how his autopsy was diffrent than the wound the people on the scene had seen.
We saw the same film before and after it was re-done for improvement. The governor of Texas at the time who was riding in the car was also wounded although I don't remember where.
 

IDefy

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
May 10, 2003
Messages
4,034
Reaction score
0
Originally posted by ORC-r0x0r-ROC
What kind of country shoots thier own president? How does that make it a conspiracy
Because that means that several people, accomplices would've committed the crime. The Warren Commission is also believed to have held evidence from the general public even though the case was "solved".
 

Ciphus

Member!
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
He fired 3 shots in 6 seconds which is considered nearly impossible. Some think he did pull it off though. They angle that the bullets entered both men came from the room he was in and could not have come from any other place though.

I think it was an organized attack, but not even by the government.
 

OMGLOLWTFPWN

Member!
Joined
Jun 15, 2003
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
0
Location
Canada
Website
Visit site
The autopsy would be different than the wound people remembered because they don't remember it accurately. It's true that your memory changes things from how they actually happened and thats the way you will remember it. Thats why witnesses to a crime can all have different stories about what happened.
 

NewPosts

New threads

Top