I had a question...

[B~E]

Isn't this the forum where you can ask for a talented fellow forumer to do a sig pic for you ? Because, you know, one with "just kidding" written in it would be really, really swell. I could do one for myself, and if fact I would be pleased to do one for someone else, but its always better when it comes from another person.

 

[Magikarp]

Close, but no llama. This is the "Rate A Picture" section.. where you post your own pictures and ask people to rate them.

The normal GFX forum is where you can ask questions about GFX and post about other GFX things. It also has a few stickies at the top, including this one:

Request A Signature Thread

Although the thread has been only remotely active at best, you still have a good chance of getting a signature.. although I would recommend that you send a PM to Tweak and ask him to make you one, or any of the other pro-GFX users.

Oh, and one more thing:

Pewp.

 

[B~E]

Pewp to you too. and thanks for the newb information.

 

[Magikarp]

Newb information as in you're a newb and you need information or as in my information was newb?

 

[B~E]

The first one

 

[CelestialBadger]

10/10. I like how you unify your piece with a monochromatic color scheme. The smile at the end really added something and finalized it, adding emphasis to an otherwise bland work of art. Spectacular work.

 

[B~E]

Déplorably, it all pale in comparison to your extensive yet flimsy critisism. The contrast of intelligence between our two work indeed propulse your post into totaly new depths, outside the realm of common sense. Truly, after having witnessed this fine post of yours, one can only be left bafled, thinking "why ?".

 

[CelestialBadger]

Your first piece was much better. You should have quit a legend rather than stumbling through another work. I would compare your latest piece to watching a retard try to paint. Perhaps you have ideas, but until you master the English language your efforts will simply be mocked by your peers.

 

[B~E]

Perhaps I will still be mocked by my peers on my poor mastery of the english language, but as long as this is the only thing they are able to criticise me for, as it seems to be the case, I wont be able to care less, trust me.
After all, they dont even know any words in my respective language, but considering I know enough of english to make comprehensive sentences and string together cohesive thoughts, I beat more than half of this forum out right at the start. Really if they would want to insult someone about something like this, I would learn two more languages or something beforehand and which words are translations and which words are actually english.

 

[CelestialBadger]

I know the language of art. Your latest piece does not even contain any words from this subtle yet beautiful language. 1/10. Needs improvement.

 

[Magikarp]

Everyone, take cover! CB and BE are having a battle of wits!

 

[B~E]

I know the language of art. Your latest piece does not even contain any words from this subtle yet beautiful language. 1/10. Needs improvement.

There are four fundamental assumptions bad critics make, and, in less that 3 lines, you made two of them, namely, that there is one universal and objective measure of how good and bad anything is, and that anyone that doesn’t possess this skill, this assumption (including the creator of the work, myself) is an idiot and should be ridiculed.
But where you really poke yourself in the eyeball, my dear critic, is that you make the ridiculous assumption that proper english is required as a fundamental medium for my creation, when in reality, anyone who knows anything about art knows that the medium doesn't matter, its the result. After all, Pollock may have been a retard, but nevermind who he was, nevermind how he did it, only the end, the resulting work, matters.
Now, if I were you, for the sake of our readers and for the sake of the people who still see you as major intellectual figure of these forums, I'd content myself with criticizing asylum material. Now, for the monocromic ending, which has become my trademark, according to my critic : :dance

 

[Vadriel]

Beautiful. Bravo, my lad. Your work shows great promise. I commend you on a job well done. In a world of many pretenders and imitators, you have risen above the obstacle of mediocrity to paint a very imaginative and whimsical picture of contemporary events. I rate your work a ten out of ten possible points. Bravo.

 

[CelestialBadger]

There are four fundamental assumptions bad critics make, and, in less that 3 lines, you made two of them, namely, that there is one universal and objective measure of how good and bad anything is, and that anyone that doesn’t possess this skill, this assumption (including the creator of the work, myself) is an idiot and should be ridiculed.
But where you really poke yourself in the eyeball, my dear critic, is that you make the ridiculous assumption that proper english is required as a fundamental medium for my creation, when in reality, anyone who knows anything about art knows that the medium doesn't matter, its the result. After all, Pollock may have been a retard, but nevermind who he was, nevermind how he did it, only the end, the resulting work, matters.
Now, if I were you, for the sake of our readers and for the sake of the people who still see you as major intellectual figure of these forums, I'd content myself with criticizing asylum material. Now, for the monocromic ending, which has become my trademark, according to my critic : :dance

How can only the end result matter when you admit that the end result is subjective? It sounds like you're simply trying to justify the poor quality of your work.