Honestly

[Flempipes]

Im not one to stand up for Ugly One...........................
but after reading all his voided threads I have to ask, Why are they voided?¿?

there are hundreds of threads more ignorant that deserve it, not to mention some of them prove his point (like the one about staff being hippocrits).

I like the current staff but,,,,, cmon!!!!!!!! there is no reason except the fact you guys dont like being flamed

 

[Tw@]

because nobody likes her, and she's useless.

 

[Flempipes]

doesnt ****ing matter, everyone gets flamed, people need to stop being pussies,,,,
no one likes Chris (egotistical asswhole) but his shit doesnt get voided

 

[Tw@]

this is BF, not the ****in justice league. nobody likes whats-her-name so everyone voids her threads and flames her. worse shit has happened.

 

[Flempipes]

I know, Im not defending her, but that shit aint cool and never used to happen

 

[Tw@]

she built a reputation for making spam threads, and being an idiot, and now she has to pay. might not be completely fair, but i'm sure as hell not about to complain on her behalf.

 

[Flempipes]

Still, the bitch aint lying when she said shit like that never use to happen

 

[B~E]

Thats because the people in charge have no more respect to lose anymore, so they just go ahead with this kind of crap unabashed. In a normal forum it wouldnt go down like this.

 

[jd-inflames]

LB is a girl? Aww.

But no, allow me to justify this, as I participated in voiding about 1/2 the threads. It wasn't me picking on her (I suppose I'll say her now?), it was me trying to help Jim, of whom was trying to clean the Asylum. By the new ruleset requested by Eric, he wants NO threads containing criticism on how the staff are running the forums. He feels that belongs in PM format to the particular staff member's superior (GM or Admin if all else fails, other admin if the problem is with an admin) or even in the staff forums if you aren't certain.

Some of those threads I would admit were questionable, but I will back up Jim 100% on his decision to move them out. Even if it's the Asylum, I'm pretty sure that those people who are actually making strides to keep this place in order don't want that place to derail the dignity of BattleForums as a whole, and I agree with that whole heartedly.

I know you are probably wondering where the hell I came from, but just deal with the fact that I AM back and AM making strides to fix some of the problems, how stupid they might be. I might now have as much hope for this site as I used to, but I do still intend to die with it, as a loyal member. I've never been referred to as biased before, and I don't intend to pick up that reputation now. I talked with LB last night, and s/he (even though rather grumpy about it), seemed to pick up my hint after a while.

So in the future, try to pay attention to guideline updates, as I'm noticing they have been changing rather frequently. Also know that I don't treat anyone fair, and am rather easy to reach, and even easier to talk to.

And BE, to the majority of the members who remember me, I still have a great deal of respect to lose.

~jd-inflames

 

[Arkillo]

Wow you take this site way to serious buddy. Jimbo moves the threads because LB's a moron. Plain and simple.

You're on some kind of holy crusade to fix all of battleforums like you're it's own personal messiah. Get over yourself.

 

[jd-inflames]

How does any of that imply I'm on a personal crusade to fix BF (especially after I've made it rather clear that I've lost hope for it), and when did I say anything about being it's personal messiah? I'm just taking responsibility for my actions, something that has never been one of your best qualities.

 

[concrete_sox]

jimbo does what he pleases no shame in taht

 

[CelestialBadger]

he wants NO threads containing criticism on how the staff are running the forums.

I thought that only applied to staff criticizing other staff. Since when does it apply to regular members?

 

[jd-inflames]

2) There will be no flaming a staff members ability to staff his sections.
This means:
If you have a problem with a staff member, PM them, or PM an admin, or GM, do NOT make a thread in the asylum or battlestaff about it.
However, you CAN flame staff members in the asylum IE, "Souless doesn't do anything but whine on bf and trolls everyone"
You CANNOT flame his ability to staff IE, "Souless moved my thread in the WOW section for no reason!! He's such a shitty mod!!1"

In otherwords, flaming staff is fine, as long as it doesn't pertain to their ability as staff, or how they do their job.

http://www.battleforums.com/showthread.php?t=128080

There ya go.

 

[Flempipes]

Man this is turning in a facist forum, better look over your shoulder, big brother is watching

 

[Arkillo]

no watch out big brothers eye omacs lol

 

[CelestialBadger]

There will be no flaming a staff members ability to staff his sections.
This means:
If you have a problem with a staff member, PM them, or PM an admin, or GM, do NOT make a thread in the asylum or battlestaff about it.
However, you CAN flame staff members in the asylum IE, "Souless doesn't do anything but whine on bf and trolls everyone"
You CANNOT flame his ability to staff IE, "Souless moved my thread in the WOW section for no reason!! He's such a shitty mod!!1"

That's pretty ****ing lame. When did that happen?

 

[Ntrik_]

if ppl cant criticize staff, then how do you want to receive feedbacks on how this site is run?

thats ****ing lame

 

[Arkillo]

He's a dick for mentioning me twice in there as negative things too.

Like I'm such a bad mod or something.

 

[Lizardbreath]

Wow you take this site way to serious buddy. Jimbo moves the threads because LB's a moron. Plain and simple.

You're on some kind of holy crusade to fix all of battleforums like you're it's own personal messiah. Get over yourself.

First of all I am not a girl so let's through that idea right out the window.


Secondly, I disagree with the new rules but I still don't think that moving somebody's posts because he is a "moron" is a justifyable answer. Guess just shows the amount of maturity you have Morningstar; you can't even draw a fine line between your emotions and your job. This new rule is stupid and is EXTREMELY hypocritical given our current staff's past track record of defiance and callouts against the staff when they were ordinary members.

Thirdly, If anybody needs to get over themselves it's you Souless. You spend your whole day on here bragging about everything listed in my sig that you have made up and think you are a god at everything. So before you tell somebody to get their head out of their ass you might want to check your own, because I bet your ass is pretty clogged from your head being up there so long.