GTA:SA hot cofee ( may contain mature content )

Bapes

Forever Rain
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
922
Reaction score
0
Location
A road, with a house on it.
Website
frltd.blog125.fc2.com
Discuss, no downloads to hot cofee Here is mine(taken from here ):
illspririt said:
After the last two weeks of controversy and confusion regarding the rating and contents of video games, lots of you have been left asking the question "how do the ratings work?" Well, it's really not an easy question to answer, as it most likely involves esoteric astrology rituals unknown to most and/or super computers running advanced chaos mathematics algorithms to randomly generate ratings. At any rate, I've put together a brief guide to help clear things up.We'll start towards the middle of the spectrum at the Teen rating, since everything below it pretty much consists of brightly colored talking animals and ninety billion Tetris clones. As highlighted and attacked recently by everyone's favorite anti-game crusader, The Sims 2 is a life simulator game which involves making babies. Since it's rated Teen, all the baby making antics and other nudity are tastefully covered up with with a comical pixel blur. A blur which can be easily disabled by entering a quick code in the command console to unlock all the hot naked sex. However, since the sims lack, erm, reproductive organs, it's apparently perfectly safe for kids to make 'em dry hump each other all day. An as an added bonus, it can help parents teach kids where babies come from without that awkward "birds and bees" nonsense. Sweet! So, if naked Barbie-esque people screwing like bunnies isn't enough to get a Mature rating, what is? Simple. You just add some skimpy clothes to them first. For those with the attention span of a fruit fly or politician, Vice City had several missions involving a porn studio, and cut scenes showing the making of the porn, as pictured right. Sure, the M rating had much more to do with the stacks of joyful violence and carnage than it did the porn missions, but either way dressing the actors in swimsuits was enough to raise the rating. The Sims 2 only reached the level of "sexual themes", while Vice City scored a "strong sexual content" warning on its label despite showing less skin than The Sims 2. Of course sims don't have any parts to show, but the characters in VC don't even show the places where parts should be, so, yea.Now that we've established adding clothes to sex scenes can bump a rating up from Teen to M, how does one achieve the dreaded Adults Only sticker? By adding even more clothes! Yep, I know it sounds quite insane, but just look at this picture from an unmodified "Hot Coffee" scene. As you can clearly see, the dude is wearing a tank top, pants, and even shoes. Shoes of all things! Not only is he wearing 80% more clothes than the sex scenes in Vice City (and 100% more than the sims), but the girls are too. And aside from just having more clothes on, the content was locked away in a manner which required modding on a PC or memory hacking on a console to view. Seeing as The Sims has demonstrated that having sex and (arguable) nudity is perfectly fine in a Teen rated game as long as it is hidden by a censorship scheme which is easily defeated by any seven year old using an in-game cheat, then having it completely inaccessible outside of modding in San Andreas can't be a legitimate reason for an AO rating. And if naked dry humping is Teen for The Sims, scantily-clothed dry humping is M for Vice City, and fully clothed dry humping is AO for San Andreas, then there is only one logical conclusion to be drawn: clothes are ****ing evil and should all be burned, banned, and burned again! That said, the only thing more shocking the industry could do is a game about Eskimos. Even the mere mention of it here will surely result in my eternal damnation, so I dare not post a single picture of the inside of the igloo. Why, I bet they're wearing big furry parkas with hoods(!) in there while rubbing their naughty little noses together. If such a game was ever created, it would without a doubt bring forth the Apocalypse.
Discuss!
 

Biske

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2003
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
0
Location
Nineveh
This was too good for Rockstar. I conclude that it was a stunt pulled by them to gain publicity. I mean, just because some stores will pull, I doubt sales are going to decrease. All the controversy did was burn the fire brighter.
 

munchyman

Eat your vegetables!
Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
1,624
Reaction score
1
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
Visit site
and yet.........it had the oppostie effect.

stores all over are taking SA off their shelves, and mrs hillary rodham clinton looks all the better for her anti-"bad youth" '08 campaign..
goddamn politics.
 

neilsdiablo

Member!
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
It probably wasn't a publicity stunt. They were just probably trying to top Gta 3 which was the best game of the decade.
 

munchyman

Eat your vegetables!
Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
1,624
Reaction score
1
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Website
Visit site
and noone ssaid anything about gta 4......interesting.
 

Hitsua

+
Joined
May 26, 2003
Messages
4,305
Reaction score
5
I didn't read the article, but I do remember hearing somwhere it was just a programing mistake, which was never taken out. Versus, re coding it, they just left that part in the game.
 

Sly

Member!
Joined
Feb 25, 2004
Messages
3,211
Reaction score
2
Location
In Spain, under Ace's bed.
Website
Visit site
x42bn6 said:
Parents play The Sims 2, therefore this game will never become an issue.*
O so true. But the Sims didnt include the content on the disc, it was put in by another person. GTA actually had this included with the game when bought.
 
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
714
Reaction score
0
Like kids haven't seen movies with that content, big deal, the government or whoever is just over reacting.
 

AZN_FLEA

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
1,388
Reaction score
0
Location
.
the contents barely arouse anyone at all~!
 

NewPosts

New threads

Top