Fire or Water?

Taligaro

Furyan Merc
Joined
Jul 17, 2004
Messages
462
Reaction score
0
If you had a choice if being burned alive or drowned... what would you choose? Why is one better or worse then the other? What goes into being killed from either method?
 

jd-inflames

Melodic Murderer
Joined
Oct 2, 2003
Messages
6,014
Reaction score
6
Location
My Sanctuary
Website
www.cursedprophets.com
Personally, I'd prefer neither ;) But if some sick man decided I had to die one way or another, I'd say fire. It only hurts for a few moments, even though it hurts REALLY bad, I won't feel as smothered before I pass out and die.
 

DB

Premium Member
Joined
May 17, 2003
Messages
5,397
Reaction score
4
Website
Visit site
Well considering that fire would kill all of your nerves quickly with a few seconds of pure pain, but drowning would suck because you know that you could only hold air in your lungs for so long until you eventually ran out. My vote is on death by sex. But, if I really had to choose it would be by fire.
 

Kuzmich

Member!
Joined
Nov 23, 2003
Messages
3,160
Reaction score
0
Location
Russia, Moscow
Website
Visit site
[glow=red]Fire, cause its quicker. I would probably make my heart stop before i am i am lite up. I know how do that, seriously i did it once for like a second.[/glow]
 

Tempest Storm

Premium Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2003
Messages
1,829
Reaction score
1
Website
www.war3.com
If I were still a mod, I'ld move this. ;)

Personally, I'ld rather drown. It's a bit more peaceful and not quite as painful.
 

Kuzmich

Member!
Joined
Nov 23, 2003
Messages
3,160
Reaction score
0
Location
Russia, Moscow
Website
Visit site
[glow=red]But choking you experience before the end is quiet unpleasant.[/glow]
 

amrtin77

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
2,750
Reaction score
0
Location
United States
Website
Visit site
id rather drown. being burnt alive suffocates you anyways. the fire takes in all of tghe oxygen around you and you only breath in fire. not to mention the burn. if youve ever been burnt you know even a little burn hurts for a long time. bad burns hurt really bad, unless they burn out your nerves.

drowning is just suffocation and breathing in water.
 

Jimbo

Member!
Joined
Jul 11, 2003
Messages
4,493
Reaction score
11
Website
Visit site
meh,i would drown because as amart said the smoke suffocates you anyway,and its teh pain k, water is just a very bad feeling,but not pain
 

Raccoon

Post Djinn
Joined
Oct 17, 2002
Messages
1,770
Reaction score
1
I'd rather drown. You would pass out from lack of oxygen before you feel any 'real' discomfort.
 

cxoli

BattleForums Addict
Joined
Mar 19, 2004
Messages
644
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas lol
Website
cxoli.net
Both of those would be such horrible ways to die o_O I imagine fire would be agony up until the point you died, whereas drowning would be mostly just terrifying rather than painful. I guess I'd go with drowning, though I'm not really sure why....I guess I'm just less afraid of that than I am of excruciating pain, and it seems like death by drowning would be easier to accept as it was happening (i.e. you could just not hold your breath and get it over with more quickly).

But ideally, if someone was going to kill me, I would want them to drop me out of a plane without a parachute. That way I could at least have fun on the way down and try to take out a house or a small child or something when I landed :)
 

Darkmatter

Battle God
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
12,994
Reaction score
4
Location
Palmdale
Website
www.battleforums.com
Fire, because It would generally be a darker form of death then drownding. I'd rather burn to death in a hellish infenro then drown at the bottom of the sea.
 

pyro_junky

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2003
Messages
1,248
Reaction score
0
Location
your moms bed room ;)
Website
Visit site
fire because i'm a pyro and i wana be like "oh so this is what i been doing to those poor animals when i was 13... i deserve to die" and it would be cool to be engulfed in flames... not sure why but i'm sure it would be cool.
 

JeRkInS

Member!
Joined
Aug 29, 2004
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Location
Madison
Website
www.hurley.com
i wouldnt really wanna die one of those ways but if i had to FOR SURE DROWN for sure... and im not going back on that i hate getting burned... and cant imagen being burned alive for min and min and burned all throught ur body i mean just a stove burn on a finger or from fireworks SUCKS ASS for like 5 days

so yeah... i choose Die by water

yeah id kinna wanna go out in a firce battle in iraq getting like 50 rebel bastards takeing me and like the rest of my chalk out but we wouldnt go out with a fight shooting out our m16's and m60's presufully and then asking for some more dope and bear as you run out of ammo and pull out ur secondary (pistol) and then when u empty the clip u get a quick shot to the head or taking u out with no pain :) thats a way i would wanna go :shoot
 

BH_Naft

Member!
Joined
Jun 30, 2003
Messages
805
Reaction score
0
Location
California.
Website
Visit site
Fire, because It would generally be a darker form of death then drownding
dont try so hard to be "dark". realistically drowning at the bottom of the ocean would be much darker. 1. fire emitts large amounts of light 2. no light reaches the bottom of the ocean 3. water absorbs light, not gives it off
4. water is a cool color in hue, fire is a hot color. cool colors are darker than hot ones.

while drowning would be much more pleasant and calming(provided you wereng stressing and flipping out), i would rather burn. wether i would choose that because of hydrophobia, pyrophilia, ignorance, stupidity, the insatiable desire to scream inhumanly, masochism, boredom, or any other reason, i dont know. i just think i probably would.
 

JeRkInS

Member!
Joined
Aug 29, 2004
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Location
Madison
Website
www.hurley.com
BH_Naft said:
dont try so hard to be "dark". realistically drowning at the bottom of the ocean would be much darker. 1. fire emitts large amounts of light 2. no light reaches the bottom of the ocean 3. water absorbs light, not gives it off
4. water is a cool color in hue, fire is a hot color. cool colors are darker than hot ones.

while drowning would be much more pleasant and calming(provided you wereng stressing and flipping out), i would rather burn. wether i would choose that because of hydrophobia, pyrophilia, ignorance, stupidity, the insatiable desire to scream inhumanly, masochism, boredom, or any other reason, i dont know. i just think i probably would.

LOL ur funny naft I totally agree

o and gothic sucks!!!
 

Darkmatter

Battle God
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
12,994
Reaction score
4
Location
Palmdale
Website
www.battleforums.com
Why not? Yes, it would emit less light as far as that goes, but fire generally signals evil, while water usually does not. Fire is red, ight? Red and Black are my colors. Blue is not.
 

Oxide08

[New And Improved!]
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
0
Location
Good Ol' Canada
Website
Visit site
i am told that drowning is the calmest way to die ... but hten i was like wtf how can u be calm when ur all like OMFG I NEED AIR ... i would ratehr...i dont know i hate to pick cuz both would suck probably burn... drowning seems to traumatic
 

IDefy

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
May 10, 2003
Messages
4,034
Reaction score
0
Fire. It makes you seem week if you die due to water. OWNED BY WATER just doesn't cut it.
 

ChrisH36

Guy with Most Posts on Quiet Board.
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
15,042
Reaction score
4
Location
Temple Prime, Sarajevo
drowned, then i can come back as a ghost of the lake and throw people into th e water and MAKE them drown. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :grunt
 

NewPosts

New threads

Top