Digital Painting

Arkillo

The best of both worlds
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
10,653
Reaction score
6
Website
myspace.com
 

Arkillo

The best of both worlds
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
10,653
Reaction score
6
Website
myspace.com
what are you trying to say?
 

Carbon

Battle God
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
1,658
Reaction score
2
Location
Sanctuary
Can you back that up considering you have no ability whatsoever or knowledge of artistic criticism?

You don't need to respond. The answer is clear. :Yawn:
 

CelestialBadger

Retired Staff
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Messages
6,792
Reaction score
18
No offense to you carbon, but I wish you wouldn't post your work if you're going to get really defensive about it.

It looks very flat and lacks detail.
 

Carbon

Battle God
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
1,658
Reaction score
2
Location
Sanctuary
No offense to you carbon, but I wish you wouldn't post your work if you're going to get really defensive about it.

It looks very flat and lacks detail.
You're right. Why would I post something when people here are too immature to take anything seriously. Sure Soul's painting may have more detail. But did he use a reference? Probably. Did he use a grid? Probably. Did he take a photo and smudge it to make it look like a painting? Maybe. I came to the wrong place to look for critique on my first digital painting.

I used a palette I created, I had an idea that was original.
 

CelestialBadger

Retired Staff
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Messages
6,792
Reaction score
18
What? dude, I'm talking about yours not souless's. I'm talking about what you did wrong, not what you did right. That's what a critique is.
 

Carbon

Battle God
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
1,658
Reaction score
2
Location
Sanctuary
What? dude, I'm talking about yours not souless's. I'm talking about what you did wrong, not what you did right. That's what a critique is.
Much thanks. I thought something like:

"Good try, I think adding more depth and detail to the tree would add a lot to it"

Would seem like a better critique than "Very flat, lacks detail."

But than again, I'm not the person giving critique.

:icon_lol:
 

CelestialBadger

Retired Staff
Joined
Feb 18, 2003
Messages
6,792
Reaction score
18
Those both essentially say the same thing.
 

Tw@

Hello
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
1,160
Reaction score
2
Much thanks. I thought something like:

"Good try, I think adding more depth and detail to the tree would add a lot to it"

Would seem like a better critique than "Very flat, lacks detail."

But than again, I'm not the person giving critique.

:icon_lol:
Looks to me that, with examples like those, you don't need us then.
 

EatShrooms

Inspector Jackoff
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Location
EatShrooms@Azeroth
You're right. Why would I post something when people here are too immature to take anything seriously. Sure Soul's painting may have more detail. But did he use a reference? Probably. Did he use a grid? Probably. Did he take a photo and smudge it to make it look like a painting? Maybe. I came to the wrong place to look for critique on my first digital painting.

I used a palette I created, I had an idea that was original.
**** a goat about it deviantart faggot spawn. Art critics are just as full of shіt as their hoodlum counterparts, the only difference is art critics are afraid to appeal to something new outside their own field. Go ahead and run to someone that's going to menstruate their emotional theories about your pathetic attempt at art. I don't need to detail my aesthetic judgment about your work. I have no appreciation of it and I made it clear. Don't tell me you posted your digital painting in pursuit of a rational critique without mentioning it. At least do that before you start lashing about my perfectly decent discernment.

Your painting sucks. Quit trying.
 

Carbon

Battle God
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
1,658
Reaction score
2
Location
Sanctuary
You said nothing right there other than I should have posted that I wanted critique, and that my painting sucks. I'm looking for reasons why it sucks. Don't get so raged.

@everyone.

I think it's less the fact I'm being defensive, and more the fact everyone is so hostile.
 

Guest

Premium Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2003
Messages
3,905
Reaction score
2
Location
New york
Website
gamerz-lounge.com
I remember when SouLeSs showed us how he made it. Awesomeness.
 

EatShrooms

Inspector Jackoff
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Location
EatShrooms@Azeroth
You said nothing right there other than I should have posted that I wanted critique, and that my painting sucks. I'm looking for reasons why it sucks. Don't get so raged.

@everyone.

I think it's less the fact I'm being defensive, and more the fact everyone is so hostile.
Can you back that up considering you have no ability whatsoever or knowledge of artistic criticism?

You don't need to respond. The answer is clear.
There was plenty said, your low-grade observations (which you'll need to develop if you want to get any where with art) lead you to believe that I was raged. I separated myself clearly from your emotional runts, rage is out of the question.

You didn't say you wanted to know why I think your painting sucks prior to your last post. Don't try taking back what you said jerkoff. I have nothing more to add other than it sucks, draw your own imaginative conclusions about my statement. Maybe this will help: Any defecating orifice

Here's the "art" that Carbon made if anybody else would like to critique this joke, since he took it down:

 

NewPosts

New threads

Top