300+ Reasons why WC is better then SC

FakeNameHere

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2003
Messages
3,090
Reaction score
0
Website
www.battleforums.com
if u want to comment, at least put 1 reason (must be good)
1. Tons of layers in terrain, allowing fun fun.

um... thats it.
 

Static

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
4,356
Reaction score
7
Location
Joe's Garage.
do you think WC3 will in the long run do better than SC

2. Heros give the game an extra thing to say "hey this game is cool"
 

Maelstorm

Member!
Joined
Aug 19, 2003
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
Website
Visit site
come on get serious...i never liked sc ...but w3 was somthing intresting.....sc got too old too fast....but with w3 heros..and 4 races......
adnywasys.....
w3is bettter cuz onf battle net....better ranking and stuff..
 

aphextwin

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
4,394
Reaction score
0
ololol theres a thread in the starcraft section
100+ reason y sc is better than wc3
 

Theroy

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
5,067
Reaction score
2
Website
www.securegamers.com
Originally posted by Maelstorm
come on get serious...i never liked sc ...but w3 was somthing intresting.....sc got too old too fast....but with w3 heros..and 4 races......
adnywasys.....
w3is bettter cuz onf battle net....better ranking and stuff..
I suppose, you needed this? BQ92H-YPC9T-3MCMY-7PPH8-8J3JF
 

IceDevil9

BattleForums Senior Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2003
Messages
3,418
Reaction score
3
Location
CA
Website
www.rcthaven.com
4. The Map Editor is sooooo much better

-Frank :cool:
 

Grimace

Member!
Joined
Aug 1, 2003
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Oohhh a cd-key, wow, maybe i can play on bnet now, lol joking. Oh and if it is legit, then that CD key has only 25 characters. Missing one...

5. When you use a spell in SC like Plague, if all the defilers are selected, they ALL use plague which is bad for MANA. If you use Cripple or an 'AoE' Spell like Plague is WC3, only ONE unit casts it which is much better.

If SC WAS better wouldn't they have 400+ reasons instead of only 100+ ? :p

SC is still alright, Blizzard is cool!!
 

Aragorn7

Member!
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
3,907
Reaction score
0
Location
At My Computer, Where Else?
6. Graphic System and Interface are better
7. Game Features such as placing rally points on units are allowed in WC3 but not in SC
8. WC3 actually requires strategy, not just "massing" carriers and trying to kill someone with them.

WC3 is a way more powerful engine and starcraft can't compete with that. The only reason people still like starcraft is because they have really crappy computers, and can't run WC3.
 

Forged

Premium Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2002
Messages
5,433
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
Website
www.securegamers.com
7. Game Features such as placing rally points on units are allowed in WC3 but not in SC
8. WC3 actually requires strategy, not just "massing" carriers and trying to kill someone with them.
umm no.....

9. No winbots
 

Aragorn7

Member!
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
3,907
Reaction score
0
Location
At My Computer, Where Else?
Originally posted by Forged
umm no.....

9. No winbots
What are you talking about forge? You don't get to place rally points on units or on resources in SC. SC is so old that you cannot do that. And don't tell me you can, because I recently played it and you can't. And about the carriers....it is mostly true. That game is mostly about massing really good units....to kill the other peoples good units. It is actually kinda sad now that you look at it, you can't micro at all. It is all macro. SC requires less skill than WC3 does.
 

Emperor Pan I

Respected Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2002
Messages
12,653
Reaction score
12
Location
Canada
SC truely requires less skill, that I agree.

10.units are easier to control, since the game is more micro then anything
 

Jenny

is ....listed
Joined
May 24, 2003
Messages
4,284
Reaction score
10
--

Zerg Queens were air and had skills, close enough to magic o_O

12. Obviously, more race selections.
 

Aragorn7

Member!
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
3,907
Reaction score
0
Location
At My Computer, Where Else?
15. You can actually create new units within the editor, unlike starcraft where you could only modify existing ones. :(
16. Triggers are more extensive in the editor, you actually get to use variables!
17. In WC3 you start out with more money, thus making the game go quicker
 

Forged

Premium Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2002
Messages
5,433
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
Website
www.securegamers.com
Originally posted by Aragorn7
What are you talking about forge? You don't get to place rally points on units or on resources in SC. SC is so old that you cannot do that. And don't tell me you can, because I recently played it and you can't. And about the carriers....it is mostly true. That game is mostly about massing really good units....to kill the other peoples good units. It is actually kinda sad now that you look at it, you can't micro at all. It is all macro. SC requires less skill than WC3 does.
I think I confused what you said, but you can make men go to rally points going outside of the rax, and the only games I have ever seen people mass carriers would be in fastest....
 

Aragorn7

Member!
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
3,907
Reaction score
0
Location
At My Computer, Where Else?
Originally posted by Forged
I think I confused what you said, but you can make men go to rally points going outside of the rax, and the only games I have ever seen people mass carriers would be in fastest....
What I meant was that you can't place rally points on units/heros. You can place rally points to locations, but not units/heros/resources.

18. Bnet for WC3 is way better with AMM
19. 100 food limit makes the game more challenging
 

New threads

Top